Manoj Ambaram Kahar vs Indian Red Cross Society & 2 on 12 July, 2016
With regard to the averments and contentions in the petition, the
para wise reply of the respondent is as follows:
8.1 With regard to para
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 153 (0.93 seconds)Jitendra Mansukhlal Adesara vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax on 4 January, 2021
Without prejudice to the above, the para wise reply to the
contentions raised by the petitioner is as under.
(i) With reference to paragraphs
Chandubhai I Patel vs Chief Executive Officer on 20 December, 2018
Soparkar also invited the attention of this Court to
the reply filed on behalf of the respondent No.2, duly affirmed
by the Asst. General ... placing on record the
stand of RBI. I am not filing para-wise reply to the entire
petition. However, my non dealing with the petition
Jitendra Mansukhlal Adesara vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax on 4 January, 2021
Without prejudice to the above, the para wise reply to the
contentions raised by the petitioner is as under.
(i) With reference to paragraphs
Sibli @ Sabit S/O Abdul Karim Muslim vs State Of Gujarat on 24 August, 2018
dealing with the affidavit in reply parawise and reserve my
right to file further detailed parawise affidavit as and when
required ... dealing
with memo of this application, annexures in detail and parawise.
3. Unless specifically admitted, the stand taken by the accused
in the application
Priyavadan Jivrajbhai Korat vs State Of Gujarat on 24 December, 2018
petition is premature. It is
further submitted that at this stage para wise reply is not
offered because certain facts/grounds would be disclosed
Jarun Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd. vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1)(2) on 25 June, 2019
behalf of the Revenue affidavit-in-reply has been
filed, duly affirmed by one Shri M.N. Sahay, Income Tax
Officer, Ward ... merits and be summarily
rejected.
3. Without prejudice to the above para wise reply to the
petition is as under :
4. The facts are that
Shafi Mahommad Allahbaksh Khedawala vs State Of Gujarat & on 14 October, 2015
reply.
This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the bank to
file reply in first matter and may be treated reply ... factual aspect mention in
the petition is not dealing with this reply para wise, non
dealing reply Para wise may not be treated
Ilaben Rohitkumar Pandya vs Anand Agriculture Universitythrough ... on 8 August, 2016
Junior Clerk in the pay scale of Rs.520020200/.
Parawise reply:
6 With reference to paras 1 to 4 of the petition
Rashmi Dhanvant Soni vs Sardar Krishinagar Dantiwada ... on 5 July, 2016
made by the respondent for the
purpose of fixing the pension.
Para-wise reply.
5. With reference to paragraphs 1 to 4 of the petition