carry out
investigation right from the beginning, which is continued. In reply,
it is stated that notices have been issued to Respondent ... Thereafter, in the rejoinder, the Petitioner has dealt with the reply
para-wise reply. In paragraph-28, the Petitioner stated that
Respondent
State called for para-wise
comments from the detaining authority. The detaining authority
supplied the para-wise comments to the State on 18 November ... delay of 23 days in sending para-
wise comments. There is not even a sentence in the reply regarding the
delay, let alone an attempt
chronology of the events.
7. As per the affidavit-in-reply filed by Respondent No.1-
detaining authority, the detention order was passed ... Police Station, Solapur
and the para-wise remarks were received on 27 October 2021. The
para-wise remarks were signed by the detaining authority
Petitioner will have to be seen.
6. The Detaining Authority, in the reply, has stated that
parawise comments were sent to the State Government ... email and why
this facility was not utilized for sending the para-wise remarks.
When it is a constitutional mandate to decide the detune
Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A vs Videocon Industries Limited on 5 December, 2013
Author: N
Shri.Mangesh Nivrutti Kashid vs The District Collector on 4 May, 2012
Author: N.M
Nelco Limited vs The Union Of India Through Revenue ... on 20 March, 2020
Equivalent citations
Dr. Harish Shetty vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr The ... on 22 March, 2024
Author
Bachpan Bachao Andolan And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 1 February
Dhanlaxmi Mahila Mandal And Ors vs The Union Of India, Through Its ... on 6 December
