noted in the order of this Tribunal dated 24.06.2021 as follows:
" Para Objections Remarks
No.
1 The above case has been posted today ... Counsel appearing forthe Karnataka No Comments
Pollution Control had filed their para-wise reply with
respect to the objections submitted by the applicant.
5 Learned
Learned Counsel appearing for the Karnataka Pollution Control
had filed their para-wise reply with respect to the objections
submitted by the applicant.
5. Learned ... Committee but only Pollution Control Board has given
para-wise reply which is not sufficient.
7. On the other hand, Learned Counsel appearing
destroying the mangrove vegetation, evidenced by Annexure - R5. They
have sent their reply that they have not undertaken any dredging activity
within the Kakinada Deep ... Energy Limited are different. They have made
Page 13 of 50
para wise reply reiterating the above contentions and prayed for
dismissal of the application
Mr. Sajimon Salim vs Ministry Of Environment & Forest on 14 September, 2022
Bench: K
such the
allegations are not correct. They have also given para wise reply more or less
reiterating the contentions raised in the earlier paragraphs
same was received through CPC B
counsel. That para wise reply from CPC B on the said
objections are as below:
Para ... submitted that with respect to averments
made is para 1 to 14 are about General information, on-
going remediation work and its status, hence
have not committed
any violations and they have also given the para-wise reply in a tabular
forum which reads as follows ... Pollution Control Board dated nil,
received on 11.09.2020 which was extracted in para 5 of the order which
reads as follows:
5. We have received
2018. They have also given the detailed reply in the above lines in
Para-wise. They also given the details of Terms of Reference ... enclosed as Annexure 7.
site visit on 04 - 05th February 2. Proponent reply to the committee
2017 shall be submitted observation is enclosed as Annexure
S. Pugazhendhi vs Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control ... on 22 December, 2021
Bench: K Ramakrishnan
detailed in Para (4) of the Judgment as extracted above. They
also reiterated the same things mentioned in Para (6) of the counter which ... extracted above while answering the ground wise reply. So, we are
not reiterating the same. Regarding Para (XIV) of Grounds, it was
submitted that
