Ashok Asramji Gabhane vs Presiding Officer, School Tribunal And ... on 2 July, 2002
respondents Nos. 2A and 3. This is a document, which is para-wise reply filed by Shri. U. M. Indurkar on affidavit in Contempt Petition
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1336 (1.26 seconds)Ravi Hanumant Thorat vs The State Of Maharashtra on 14 March, 2013
Additional Chief
Secretary, who considered the representation and para-wise
reply from the detaining authority on 23-11-2012 and
rejected it on the same
Bhausaheb S/O Hiraman Mokale vs Laxman Shankar Gaikwad on 27 September, 2011
file amended written
statement on next date.
. It is further stated in para No. 8 of the
affidavit that applicants have moved an
application Exhibit ... this Court.
7. The respondent No.1 has also filed para
wise reply to the averment in the application for
condonation of delay and rejoinder
The State Of Maharashtra vs Central Bureau Of Investigation And Ors on 15 December, 2021
carry out
investigation right from the beginning, which is continued. In reply,
it is stated that notices have been issued to Respondent ... Thereafter, in the rejoinder, the Petitioner has dealt with the reply
para-wise reply. In paragraph-28, the Petitioner stated that
Respondent
Municipal Labour Union vs Ig ..Petitioner on 1 October, 2014
residents and constitutional mandate. Referring to
paragraph 14 of the affidavit in reply, Mr.Shinde submits that the decision
of the State has been implemented ... Mumbai Municipal Corporation.
32 Mr.Shinde has taken us through para-wise reply in this
affidavit and which according to him denies the allegations
Indira Rajguru vs Balkrishna K. Rajguru And Ors on 10 June, 2024
only be effective from his death.
The Written statement also contain para-wise reply to
the pleadings in the Plaint and the most relevant paragraphs
Sir N. P. Vakil Trust And Anr vs Union Of India And 4 Ors on 14 July, 2016
said lands without providing any details thereto, whilst filing
a detailed para wise reply to the Plaint. Annexure - "II" to the
paper-book
Abhimanyu Ravan Ingale vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 15 January, 2015
27th May 2014, which is not correct.
(C) The deponent in para-wise reply, has
claimed that there was information received
from Mahila Bachat
Smt. Mannabi Shamsi vs B.B. Gujral on 19 September, 1978
averments in para. 5 of his affidavit-in-reply as being made in reply to the contention of the petitioner in para ... paragraphs in the affidavit-in-reply are replies to the allegations in the petition and these replies are para-wise replies. A perusal
Shivanand Madanmohan Mishra And Anr. vs Universal Ferro And Allied Chemicals ... on 8 April, 2004
prejudice to the preliminary submissions, the respondent No. 1 has also replied para wise in the written statement and has denied the allegations made