operation of the suspension order. Subsequently, after hearing both the parties, the High Court vacated the stay order. Thereafter, the appellant served a charge sheet ... aforesaid charge was the subject-matter of inquiry in the pending writ petition, and that as the respondent had launched a parallel inquiry
clear from the impugned order ex facie no formal charge has
been framed, nor explanation has been called for, nor an enquiry has been
conducted ... President. As seen from the impugned order, two lines run parallel to the
signature and one line runs below the signature of the President
clear from the impugned order ex facie no formal charge has been framed, nor explanation has been called for, nor an enquiry has been conducted ... President. As seen from the impugned order, two lines run parallel to the signature and one line runs below the signature of the President
Abraham, Chinnadurai @ Moses, ... vs State By Inspector Of Police on 29 October, 2002
Author: N
K.T. Venkatesan And K.T. Srinivasa Raja vs The Appropriate Authority (Income-Tax ... on
M/S.Peria Karamalai Tea & Produce vs Tamil Nadu Taxation Special on 29 October
K.T. Venkatesan vs Appropriate Authority on 31 October, 2002
Equivalent citations: [2002]125TAXMAN979(MAD
P. Radhakrishnan vs The District Registrar Of Societies on 15 March, 2002
IN THE HIGH
