support method, the Commission is of the
view that the parallel operation charge has to be related to the fixed
costs of the utilities. According ... GERC is as
follows:-
"6.7. Hence, we decide that the parallel operation charge is
applicable to the petitioner and the petitioner is liable
this
order."
(y) that the pre condition for levy of Parallel Operation Charge is
the co-location of the Captive Power Plant and load ... different places there is no grid support and there is no
parallel operation.
(z) that the Appellant's Tawa plant is a CPP which
commissioning of the generation project. Accordingly, it was
agreed that the commercial operation date of 400 kV D/C
Koldam-Ludhiana line should be nine ... Appellant had commenced the work of transmission
line keeping in view the parallel time lines of generation. With
the subsequent shift/delay in the generation
Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution ... vs Chhattisgarh State Electricity ... on 9 October, 2015
Appeal No.308
Power Company Of Karnataka Ltd vs Central Electricity Regulatory ... on 15 May, 2015
A.No
Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution ... vs Chhattisgarh State Electricity ... on 4 November, 2015
Before the Appellate
Ntpc Bhawan vs Central Electricity Regulatory ... on 30 November, 2015
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New
Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution ... vs Chhattisgarh State Electricity ... on 17 November, 2015
Appeal no. 202
Steel Authority Of India Limited vs Central Electricity Regulatory ... on 22 April, 2015
Appeal No
