Public Version vs Unknown on 21 April, 2025
Public Version
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Case
private carriers would co--operate on
international routes, "The world is big enough. We have enough
routes to operate without clashing with anyone unnecessarily ... parallelism between the opposite parties. The DG has compared the
prices of the tickets of the opposite parties on particular routes to the fares
charged
specific reason for price parallelism has
been given by the companies. Since the cost of production,
transportation charge etc. varies from company to company ... Parties show a positive correlation
in every State of operation. According to DG, price parallelism among
the Opposite Parties stands established which is indicative
positive correlation in the production output
among all the leading players operating in a particular region/state.
The analysis of dispatch data for the period ... manner to charge a higher price.
(xxxviii) The analysis carried out by the DG also confirmed that there was a
production parallelism among the Opposite
In Re: Alleged Cartelization By Cement ... vs M/S Shree Cement Limited-Through ... on 30
Suo-Moto Case No. 02/2010 (In Re: ... vs . on 10 January, 2012
COMP_E
Express Industry Council Of India vs Jet Airways (India) Ltd. & Others on 7 March
Express Industry Council Of India vs Jet Airways (India) Ltd. & Others on 17 November
Unilazer Ventures Private Limited vs Pvr Ltd & Others on 24 July, 2019
COMPETITION COMMISSION
price parity alone may not be sufficient to say that the airline
operators have acted in a collusive manner. The basic tenets of pricing
actions ... since
price-parallelism in itself is not an evidence to establish cartelization and
the increase in air fares by the airline operators
