coal washeries to the distribution
licensee and consequently the parallel
operation charges which were paid earlier by
the Aryan Plant to the distribution licensee
shall ... generating plant was not operating as a
captive generating plant then there was no liability to
pay parallel operation charges.
16. Section 42 (2) deals
main source of income of the assessee was interest
income being charged from zamindar to whom loans were
advanced. Verification exercise was carried ... survey operation, it was noted by the
Assessing Officer that the interest charged or chargeable was not
accounted in the parallel books of account
The Tata Power Company Limited vs Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory ... on 28 November, 2013
Appeal No104
Flex Industries Ltd vs Cce, Lucknow on 2 July, 2013
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX
Ms. Mithlesh Verma vs Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi Through on 15 May
All India Tyre Dealers Federation vs Tyre Manufacturers. Main Order (Dated ... on 16 January, 2013
Zenith Infotech Limited And Others vs Sebi on 23 July, 2013
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE
Indraprastha Power Generation Company ... vs Delhi Electricity Regulatory ... on 12 December, 2013
Judgment in Appeal
Shreekant Ranjan vs Union Of India on 5 December, 2013
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench
control vests in the seeker
of the information who has only to operate the statutorily prescribed
mechanism to access the information. It is not this ... public authority".
34. The mere prescription of a higher charge in the other statutory mechanism
(in this case Section 610 of the Companies
