does not bar the present suit as held in
Procter and Gamble (supra). Further, in Ahmedabad and Gandhidham
suits, the parties are not the same ... prevent the
courts of concurrent jurisdiction from simultaneously
trying two parallel suits and also to avoid inconsistent
findings on the matters in issue. The provision
question is whether the Delhi suit is liable to be stayed in
view of the pendency of the Amritsar suit under Section ... prevent
courts of current jurisdiction from simultaneously
trying two parallel suits between the same parties in
respect of the same matter in issue. The following
first proviso to Section 7 of the
CCA as to whether suits, which are valued below the 'specified
value', ought to be permitted ... submissions, and the
manner in which IPR suits are now sought to be adjudicated in two
parallel streams, one under the CCA and one under
closest property which could be drawn as a parallel for the
suit premises. The premises where the Bank of India had taken the space
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff- M/s Laxmi Agro
Impex India seeking ... Defendant's mark post the
filing of the suit.
5. Considering that these are parallel proceedings could lead to
multiplicity of litigation
M/S P.M.Diesels P. Ltd. vs M/S Thukral Mechanical Works & on
M/S P.M.Diesels P. Ltd. vs M/S Thukral Mechanical Works & on
M/S P.M.Diesels P. Ltd. vs M/S Thukral Mechanical Works & on
M/S P.M.Diesels P. Ltd. vs M/S Thukral Mechancial Works & on
Pm Diesels P. Ltd. vs Thukral Mechanical Works on 2 April, 2024
Author: Prathiba M
