Unknown vs State Of Tamil Nadu
differently abled person with the physical deformity of 55% (post polio residual paralysis). In view of the cut off date fixed for the minimum
Search Results Page
Search Results
51 - 60 of 118 (3.97 seconds)M. Ravinder Reddy, Warangal Dist. vs The Dy. Commissioner Of Endowments And ... on 5 June, 2023
2007 since petitioner was
suffering from Hypertension and Left sided Hemiplegia
(Paralysis).
c) After petitioner's recovery, he submitted a joining
report
Hari Madhavrao Pawar vs Chief Officer, Municipal Council, ... on 7 March, 2016
employee in the Class C or D category suffers from
Cancer or Paralysis or is temporarily disabled on account of an
accident, his legal heir
Mohan Venkati Rathod vs Chief Officer, Municipal Council, ... on 7 March, 2016
employee in the Class C or D category suffers from
Cancer or Paralysis or is temporarily disabled on account of an
accident, his legal heir
State Of Tamil Nadu vs C. Vadiappan on 11 February, 1982
formula of admission the remedy would have aggravated the malady, confusion, agitation, paralysis. The root of the grievance and the fruit of the writ
Endla Laxmi vs The State Of Telangana on 15 July, 2022
ailments. Respondent No.5 is
also suffering from paralysis and in view of education of his
children, he shifted his residence to Hanamkonda. Taking
advantage
Somabhai Lalabhai Vankar & vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 5 April, 2016
ventricular along with cardiac
failure and enlarged heat with cardiac asthma, complete paralysis of
both upper and lower limbs and failure of both kidneys, could
Mrs. Indu Behera vs State Of Orissa on 16 April, 2013
bilateral chronic
medical reneal diseases since 2010. He is also suffering from paralysis
2
and other multiple diseases. He is under constant dialysis and under
Mudam Kistaiah, Nizamabad Dist. vs The Chief Manager, S.B.H., Hyd And 2 ... on 8 September, 2023
years due to incapacitization by accidents or specific ailments like
paralysis, cancer and blindness, etcetera.
It is stated that petitioner was aged about 55 years
Bhavna Jayesh Parikh vs State Of Gujarat on 28 March, 2022
disability suffered by him on account stroke which
resulted into disability of paralysis to the extent of 75%.
10. For the aforesaid reasons ... medical ground
that he has suffered disability because of paralysis. The Division
Bench rejected such distinction and confirmed the order according
the Tiku Pay Commission