submitted by revision
petitioner that basis for claiming enhancement was sufferance
of paralysis stroke by respondent even prior to disposal of
Criminal Revision Petition ... have to be held good even in case of respondent having
suffered paralysis stroke and therefore, there was no
justification for enhancement. In the meanwhile
pronouncing some words and sagging of face on
right side due to paralysis of facial nerve. Even loss of memory
to some extent and difficulty ... assessed and 20% due to paralysis of facial nerve, resulting in
combined neurological disability of 40%.
16. However, as noted by tribunal, PW.3 admitted
pronouncing some words and sagging of face on
right side due to paralysis of facial nerve. Even loss of memory
to some extent and difficulty ... assessed and 20% due to paralysis of facial nerve, resulting in
combined neurological disability of 40%.
16. However, as noted by tribunal, PW.3 admitted
father
was taking treatment at DIMHANS, Dharwad, his mother was
suffering from paralysis and completely bed-ridden. Therefore,
petitioner required to attend to them
learned counsel for
respondent-accused submitted that accused
is bedridden due to paralysis and is not
having any source of income at present
radiologically. He specifically
deposed about claimant suffering from Monoplegia i.e. paralysis
of one limb. Since, claimant is a driver by occupation and
paralysis
callus formation is noted.
7. Sri Prashant Badhekar has facial nerve
paralysis and on AEM for post head
injury complications. He has flaccid
11
right
present.
4. Since appellant no.1 is stated to be suffering
from paralysis, he appeared through video conference.
He was identified by learned counsel
