Sessions Court, he could not surrender in time because he had
suffered paralysis and the petitioner is not a habitual offender. Therefore,
interim protection ... learned counsel for the petitioner
that he was suffering from paralysis is not supported by any evidence and
rather he had committed another offence while
Petitioner No.1 is stated to be bed ridden on account of
paralysis for the last 15 years. Petitioner No.2 was a minor when
appreciations in the game of Ball Badmin-
ton. However, due to paralysis of right side of her body on account of injuries received
bail. Still further, the appellant is also
stated to be suffered from paralysis, consequently, ends of justice will
be suitably met, if the sentence
also stated that the mother of the petitioner is suffering from paralysis
and the medical expenses regarding the same also have to be borne
retired BSF
employee and suffering from various medical ailments including paralysis,
and the petitioner's mother has already expired on 3.3.2012 due to heart
petitioner
suffered brain hemorrhage and since then he is suffering
from paralysis. The mother of the petitioner is old aged
and also not keeping good
order on the following grounds: -
(i) that her husband is suffering from paralysis and unable to accompany her
from North Delhi to Karnal which
after as also the
fact that her father is a patient of paralysis and is 100% disabled and not able
to extend any help
Ravinder, his elder brother
Sukhbir, aged about 45 years, was suffering from paralysis and was disabled
from one hand and one leg. It is further
