Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Smt. Pramila Devi vs M Sathyanarayana on 16 August, 2019 Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2019 KAR

after by the deceased Rudrappa, as plaintiff No.3 was suffering from paralysis stroke. Both the Courts have held that the deceased Rudrappa was residing ... residing along with his father i.e., the deceased Rudrappa, had suffered paralysis stroke. It is also emerged in the evidence that he was under

2001 was in the absence of original defendant- Srimant. He had suffered paralysis and was not keeping well and hence, he did not contest ... years prior to 26.10.2008 Srimant i.e. defendant No.1 has suffered paralysis attack. He was unable to move. He deposed ignorance about the family

2001 was in the absence of original defendant- Srimant. He had suffered paralysis and was not keeping well and hence, he did not contest ... years prior to 26.10.2008 Srimant i.e. defendant No.1 has suffered paralysis attack. He was unable to move. He deposed ignorance about the family

with the deceased and the mother was suffering from paralysis and cause of death is not within the knowledge of the accused ... witness, no doubt it is elicited that if a patient suffering from paralysis falls on the ground, after losing the balance, such injuries

found clinically and radiologically following the accident, Presently - 2) There is paralysis in upper and lower limbs on both sides due to cerebral and cerebellar ... traumatic injury as found clinically and radiologically. He also taken note of paralysis in upper and lower limbs on both sides due to cerebral

affidavit stating that his wife was suffering from illness with partial paralysis due to which he was providing Ayurvedic treatment through nativaidhya ... evidence is placed before the Court that his wife was suffering from paralysis. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent brought to the notice

mind by the trial court has the potentiality to lead to the paralysis of the conception of fair trial. 23. In the case at hand

that original respondent has lost his vision and is also suffering from paralysis, reasons are assigned and when statute prescribes the period that application

pathetic condition of the petitioner as he is under treatment for his paralysis and MRI report confirms the same and having considered the peculiar facts ... pathetic condition of the petitioner since he is also taking treatment for paralysis and he has been produced before the Court in wheel chair