paralysis doctypes: karnataka

S.D. Sridhar vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 15 June, 2004

category. The disability of the petitioner is due to post polio paralysis with pelvic obliquity. The disability extent is upto 65%. An advertisement was issued

Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - R Gururajan - Full Document

Maralingappa S/O Hanamanth vs The Chairman And Deputy And Anr on 8 December, 2021

petitioner is that, the father of the petitioner had a paralysis stroke and petitioner has got busy in his treatment and his father died

Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

C.S. Veeranna vs Managing Director, Davanagere Sugar ... on 27 May, 1991

Examiners appointed by the Commissioner for that purpose indicated that his partial paralysis on the right side affecting his sense of touch was not relatable ... presumed by this Court that the certified illness which is semi paralysis, as earlier stated loss of the sense of touch on the right side

Karnataka High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Sheshappa vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 15 November, 2012

back and he noticed that there is a motor sensory paralysis of both the lower limbs amounting to the whole body disability ... stated that there is a permanent disability of 90% due to sensory paralysis of both the lower limbs and whole body disability

Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - R Malimath - Full Document

Sri H K Putta vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 September, 2015

evidence as against accused No.22. She is now attacked with paralysis and has totally become invalid. The materials placed on record by the prosecution

Karnataka High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - Full Document