Paras Yadav vs Union Of India And Ors on 24 September, 2015
Author: Rakesh Kumar Jain
Bench: Rakesh Kumar Jain
VINOD KUMAR ... CHANDIGARH
CWP No.17387 of 2015
Date of decision:24.09.2015
Paras Yadav ...Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others ...Respondents
CORAM
Bipan Ghai, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Paras Talwar, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Sharad Kumar Yadav, D.A.G., Haryana
for the respondent - State
Narendra Singh Yadav Vs. State of
Haryana ). This seems to be the reason that in reply to para 12 of the
writ petition, respondents
Paras Ram vs Financial Commissioner Haryana And Ors on 2 March, 2015
Author: Jaswant Singh
Bench: Jaswant Singh
Civil Writ Petition No.3681 ... Paras Ram
.......... Petitioner
Vs.
Financial Commissioner, Haryana and others
.......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
Present: Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, Advocate
Criminal) 392 has allowed quashing but for
the same offences. Para 3 of the said judgment reads as under:-
"3. The question is whether ... down in Criminal Misc.
No.11501-M of 1996 titled Sunil Kumar Yadav v.
State of Punjab and another wherein it has been held
that
judgment should be reported in the Digest? No / Yes
***
Present : Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
***
GURMIT RAM, J.
1. The petitioner/defendant ... Rule 1
read with Section 151 , CPC, was also dismissed.
2. In para No.3 of the revision petition, the zimni orders passed
principle in a proceeding under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. In para No.14 of this judgment, it
was observed as under ... Supreme Court in
Ram Briksh Singh and othersVs. Ambika Yadav and another, (2004) 7
Supreme Court Cases 665. In this case, the High Court while
rejected."
Learned counsel for the petitioner had referred to Shiv
Kumar Yadav 's case (supra), perhaps the counsel was not aware
that ... Apex Court in Crl. Appeal Nos. 1187-1188 of
2015 on 10.09.2015. Para 29 of the judgment sums up the reasons
for disapproving the view
Arvind Singh, Advocate
for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. AG, Haryana.
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed ... facts of the case, as noticed by the learned trial Court in
paras 2 & 3 of the impugned judgment, are that
upon it unless
sufficiently and satisfactorily corroborated by other evidence.
In Dana Yadav @ Dahu and others v. State of Bihar ... pronouncements concluded as under:-
"Para 37 (a) to (d).................(e) Failure to hold
test identification parade does not make the
evidence of identification
