justice is salvaged despite such defects in investigation."
77.In Paras Yadav and Ors. v. State of Bihar, 1999(1) RCR(Criminal
dictum laid down in those case (Gajoo case, SCC pp.
54044 para 20).
"20. In regard to defective investigation, this Court in Dayal ... Dealing with the cases of omission and commission, the Court in
Paras Yadav V. State of Bihar enunciated the principle, in conformity
with the previous
Then thereafter all the accused persons left therefrom.
Brahamdeo Sah, Jagarnath Yadav, Kameshwar Yadav and Biseshwar Sah
along with others have witnessed the occurrence ... Hirdaya Sah,
Jagmohan Sah, Tanik Sah, Sukhuru Sah and Jagarnath Yadav. In para-12
had disclosed that he had found all the three injured
Then thereafter all the accused persons left therefrom.
Brahamdeo Sah, Jagarnath Yadav, Kameshwar Yadav and Biseshwar Sah
along with others have witnessed the occurrence ... Hirdaya Sah,
Jagmohan Sah, Tanik Sah, Sukhuru Sah and Jagarnath Yadav. In para-12
had disclosed that he had found all the three injured
Singh Sibbia and others v. State of Punjab , 1980 (2) SCC 565,
(Para 30), a Constitutional bench of Supreme Court held that the bail decision ... bail. In Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav , 2005 (2)
SCC 42, (Para 18) a three-member bench of Supreme Court held that
custody certificate, the petitioner is in custody since 17-04-2021. In
para 4 of the bail petition, it has been pointed out that ... bail. In
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav , 2005 (2) SCC 42, (Para 18) a
three-member Bench of Supreme Court held that
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of Punjab , 1980 (2) SCC 565, (Para 30), a
Constitutional Bench of Supreme Court held that the bail decision must ... bail. In Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav , 2005 (2) SCC 42,
(Para 18) a three-member Bench of Supreme Court held that
Singh Sibbia and others v. State of Punjab , 1980 (2) SCC
565, (Para 30), a Constitutional bench of Supreme Court held that the bail decision ... bail. In Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav ,
2005 (2) SCC 42, (Para 18) a three-member bench of Supreme Court held that
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of Punjab , 1980 (2) SCC 565, (Para 30), a
Constitutional Bench of Supreme Court held that the bail decision must ... bail. In Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav , 2005 (2) SCC
42, (Para 18) a three-member Bench of Supreme Court held that
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of Punjab , 1980 (2) SCC 565, (Para 30), a
Constitutional Bench of Supreme Court held that the bail decision must ... bail. In
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav , 2005 (2) SCC 42, (Para 18) a
three-member Bench of Supreme Court held that