Paras Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 6 April, 2021
Author: Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
Bench: Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT ... CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C. No. 254 of 2021
Paras Yadav S/o- Santosh Yadav Aged About 24 Years R/o- Fandwani
State Of U.P. Cooperatives Department ... vs Paras Nath Singh Yadav on 15 November, 2021
Bench: S. Abdul Nazeer , Krishna Murari
1
IN THE SUPREME ... THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY &
ANR. Applicant (s)/Appellant(s)
VERSUS
PARAS NATH SINGH YADAV & ORS. Respondent(s)
with
Miscellaneous Application
Bihar versus Rajballav Prasad alias
Rajballav Prasad Yadav alias Rajballabh Yadav, (2017) 2
SCC 178, para 22)
3. Each criminal case presents its own peculiar ... Bihar versus Rajballav Prasad alias
Rajballav Prasad Yadav alias Rajballabh Yadav, (2017) 2
SCC 178, para 15)
13. Giving reasons is different from discussing evidence
also held in Paras Yadav Vs. State of Bihar , 1999 (2) SCC 126, it was held that if the lapse or omission is committed
learned trial Judge, the Honourable
Supreme Court in Paras Yadav and Others vs. State of Bihar reported in
(1999) 2 SCC 126, has specifically held
learned trial Judge, the Honourable
Supreme Court in Paras Yadav and Others vs. State of Bihar reported in
(1999) 2 SCC 126, has specifically held
learned trial Judge, the Honourable
Supreme Court in Paras Yadav and Others vs. State of Bihar reported in
(1999) 2 SCC 126, has specifically held
Bihar versus Rajballav Prasad alias
Rajballav Prasad Yadav alias Rajballabh Yadav,
(2017) 2 SCC 178, para 22)
3. Each criminal case presents its own peculiar ... Bihar versus Rajballav Prasad alias Rajballav Prasad
Yadav alias Rajballabh Yadav, (2017) 2 SCC 178,
para 15)
13. Giving reasons is different from discussing
evidence
Bihar versus Rajballav Prasad alias
Rajballav Prasad Yadav alias Rajballabh Yadav, (2017) 2
SCC 178, para 22)
3. Each criminal case presents its own peculiar ... Bihar versus Rajballav Prasad alias
Rajballav Prasad Yadav alias Rajballabh Yadav, (2017) 2
SCC 178, para 15)
13. Giving reasons is different from discussing evidence
observed as follows: (SCC p. 657, paras 5-7):
"5. In the case of a defective investigation the court has to be circumspect ... State of M.P. (1995) 5 SCC 518).
6. In Paras Yadav v. State of Bihar (1999) 2 SCC 126) it was held that
