clear from the fact that it has
been reflected in the Parat Sarkar and the original
affidavit was produced from the official record which ... reference of the same finds mention and reflected
in the Parat Sarkar (copy of the order pasted in the revenue record of
mutation
averred that
description of the sides are fully detailed in Parat Sarkar of mutation
No.1408. Now, in the end of the paragraph ... calculates the sides of the Tatima shown on mutation no.1408
parat sarkar. Similarly, the tatima of killa no.12 into killa
plaintiff has
challenged Parat Patwar Mutation No.434 as well as
668. As per the case of the plaintiff the Parat Sarkar
mutation
appears to have escheated in favour of State and recorded as Khalisa Sarkar albeit in accordance with order of Assistant Commissioner dated: 07.01.1963 and that ... which the reasons for attestation whereof have been mentioned on "Parat Sarkar" of the mutation which is not forth coming for the alleged
enquire into the matter about the non-availability of the Parat
Sarkar with respect to said questioned mutation and submit a
detailed report
redeemed and a mutation was sanctioned.
Although, it is true that Parat Sarkar i.e. original order of mutation was lost
but Parat Patwar
certificate
of Roopla dated 21.2.1975, Ex.P6-mutation Parat Patwar, Ex.P7-
Parat Sarkar mutation no.3483, Ex.P8-Aksh Shijra
sought to be produced wherein there is a
footnote that in Parat Patwar (copy of Patwari) there is no order of Circle
Revenue Officer regarding ... addition to it, it has not been
asserted that even in Parat Sarkar i.e. original mutation in the office of
Circle Revenue Officer, there
mistake and for showing the pre-consolidation entries of Parat Sarkar record regarding mortgage etc. in the new record prepared during the consolidation and after
year 1956-57 and 1960-61 are inconsistent
with Parat Sarkar.
I have heard counsel for the petitioners at length and gone
through the impugned
