Singh, Assistant Collector, Grade II (Tehsildar), Budhlada, then
order in parat patwar and parat sarkar should be in the same hand i.e.
by Sohan ... parat sarkar was not on the file. Parat
patwar was in the custody of the appellant. Parat sarkar was in the
office and for production
jamabandi sfor the year 1944-45
and 1953-54 (Parat Sarkar) had been tampered with. The entries in
the column of cultivation from `Maqbooja Malkan ... Malooka Hisedar'. The complainant got the copies of the
jamabandies Parat Patwar for the year 1944-45 and 1953-54 and the
entries were
sought to be produced wherein there is a
footnote that in Parat Patwar (copy of Patwari) there is no order of Circle
Revenue Officer regarding ... addition to it, it has not been
asserted that even in Parat Sarkar i.e. original mutation in the office of
Circle Revenue Officer, there
Milan Baidya vs The State Of Assam on 15 February, 2011
Bench: Madan B.Lokur