respondent
no.1 was there in the Parat Patwar and not in the Parat Sarkar, therefore,
the other three sisters were alienating the suit property ... respondent no.1-plaintiff is shown in the Parat Patwar but was
missing in the Parat Sarkar, which though is a copy of the said
submitted that the
same share has been mentioned in the Parat Sarkar which is not in
possession of the petitioner but is in possession ... office on 23.6.2007.
Learned State counsel has placed on record Parat Sarkar
in which also share of Gurpreet Singh has been mentioned
mutation sheet."
As one original copy is available with Parat Sarkar,
accusation against the petitioner is not sustainable. At the most
copy of Khatoni Istemal Ex.P-14, a certified copy of Parat
Sarkar Ex.P-15, a certified copy of birth certificate of defendant
Rakesh Sukanuji Dafade vs State Of Maharashtra on 4 April, 2014
Author: Anoop V. Mohta
Rakesh Sukanuji Dafade vs State Of Maharashtra on 4 April, 2014
Author: Anoop V. Mohta
Rakesh Sukanuji Dafade vs State Of Maharashtra on 4 April, 2014
Author: Anoop V. Mohta
Rakesh Sukanuji Dafade vs State Of Maharashtra on 4 April, 2014
Author: Anoop V. Mohta
Rakesh Sukanuji Dafade vs State Of Maharashtra on 4 April, 2014
Author: Anoop V. Mohta
Rakesh Sukanuji Dafade vs State Of Maharashtra on 4 April, 2014
Author: Anoop V. Mohta
