Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

said CCTV footage itself and the CDRs have been referred in parcha no.12 of the case diary. The applicant has the said CCTV footage

night of the occurrence i.e. 04.01.2006 around 12:00 mid night or at about 12:30 a.m., his statement was recorded ... midnight or at 12:30 a.m. as stated by PW-1. 41. Apparently, reading of Parcha No.1 (04.01.2006) of the case diary explicitly

State Of Up vs Rajendra S/O Chunni Lal And 03 Others on 6 July

State Of Up vs Rajendra S/O Chunni Lal And 03 Others on 6 July

also collected the CCTV footage from concerned location. Same is evident from parcha no.1 of the case diary. In compliance of order dated ... show that dialogue was going on between accused prior to occurrence. 12. Ultimately, on the basis of above as well as other material collected

Madhusudan Shukla vs State Of U.P.And Another on 16 June, 2022 Author: Shekhar

Ram Samujh And Another vs State Of U.P. on 13 April, 2022 Author: Manoj

Onkar Bharadwaj vs State Of U.P. And Another on 12 April, 2022 Author: Rahul

Sri Rajat Tati vs The State Of Tripura on 25 May, 2022 Author: Arindam Lodh

State Of Up vs Gaya Singh And 3 Others on 4 August, 2022 Author: Vivek