State vs . Mohd. Mukhtar Ahmad Khan on 21 April, 2012
1
IN THE COURT OF
month of Feburary of
year 2009, SHO handed over him parcha 12 information sheet of accused
Bhagirath and accused Deepak Nanda to get it verified
NBWs issued by Court as ExP-4,
to Ex.P-6; and parcha baras as Ex.P-7 and Ex.P-8 respectively ... Adil as Ex.P6; parcha 12
papers as Ex.P7 and Ex.P8; shoes and socks as Ex.P9 (Colly); mobile
Excise Laboratory for
expert analysis. Head Constable Narender sent the parcha 12 of the
accused persons for verification, however, the same could not be
verified
disclosure statement
made on 08.11.2006. The witness termed it correct that Parcha 12 was issued in
respect of the addresses of accused persons mentioned
2012 State vs Bharat Pathak PS Timarpur
12 of 19
from the father of deceased for filing DAR before the MACT ... same was also found to be genuine. On 17.05.2012 information
sheet/parcha 12 regarding verification of address of accused was obtained and
the particulars
further deposed that
thereafter, he filled up the information sheet (parcha 12) of
accused Himanshu Ex.PW8/B. He further deposed that he verified
court
itself and formally arrested him vide arrest memo Ex. PW12/A and moved an
application before the court for conducting TIP proceedings ... deceased to submit the same
in MACT court. he got verified parcha 12 of the accused and collected FSL report of
the deceased and placed
lock up of PS Dwarka
Sector 23. On 13.10.2011 parcha 12 was verified. After the completion of
investigation, he prepared the challan and filed
recorded the statements
of the witnesses u/s 161 CrPC. The parcha12 of the accused was filled in for
verification of address. Thereafter