posted at PS G.K. I and had gone to verify Parcha 12 of the accused persons
and submitted his report.
During the crossÂexamination
payment
of fine, as requested.
12. Separate parcha/ miscellaneous file be put up before the court with bail bonds under
Section
runs Pitambar Transport. The said shop was measuring 10 ft. x 12 ft. and had old locks on it which had not been opened since ... When account books were demanded, it was told that bill parchas were with the Accountant who had gone to Mathura. No account books could
runs Pitambar Transport. The said shop was measuring 10 ft. x 12 ft. and had old locks on it which had not been opened since ... When account books were demanded, it was told that bill parchas were with the Accountant who had gone to Mathura. No account books could
Sunita Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 12 December, 2018
Author: Hemant Kumar Srivastava
Bench: Hemant Kumar Srivastava
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ... Rabindra Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR
SRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
2 12-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned
Parcha..
It is submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioner that the thrust of allegation is against the Nandlal
Mandal in whose favour the Parcha ... arrest or surrender before the learned Court below
within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc
Circle Officer,
Amin, Halka Karamchari and peon that he got a 'parcha' of the
ancestral land of the informant issued fraudulently ... land of the complainant 'parcha' has been issued but
admits that issuance of 'parcha' has already been stayed.
Considering the nature
Circle Officer,
Amin, Halka Karamchari and peon that he got a 'parcha' of the
ancestral land of the informant issued fraudulently ... land of the complainant 'parcha' has been issued but
admits that issuance of 'parcha' has already been stayed.
Considering the nature
cross
FIR No. 495/2014 PS: Amar Colony
State Vs. Ankit Parcha 2 of 5
examined by the Ld. Counsel for the accused ... evidence in this case. Prosecution evidence stood
closed vide order dated 24.08.2015.
12. The accused was examined under the provision of section 313 Criminal Procedure
Arvind Singh @ Sanju vs Amod Kumar Sonakiya on 21 August, 2014
Cr. A. No.
21.08.2014