parcha No. 11, dated 8.9.2006, he made search of the wanted accused persons and made raids at their places. In parcha no. 12, dated ... Vyasmuni Mishra and Constable Shivram were recorded. In supplementary parcha no. 12, dated 20.11.2006, the memorandum of plain soil as well as blood soaked soil
incident and it came into light that on 15.4.2006 in parcha no.7, some mobile numbers were addressed out and he made a report ... proceed with his team to Vadodara from Surat. On 19.4.2006 in parcha no.12, he endorsed about reaching Vadodara City and came to know that
said date, he had taken investigation from parcha no. 5 dated 20.8.2006 onwards. In parcha no. 5, dated 20.8.2006, he tried to find ... parcha No. 11, dated 8.9.2006, he made search of the wanted accused persons and made raids at their places. In parcha no. 12, dated
blackening present and outlet 1 Cm. ×1 Cm. right side back, D 12 rib
2. Inlet - 0.5 Cm. × 0.5 Cm. and right hip, blackening present ... injured Ballu on 13/12/2002 and also recorded statement of witness of the occurrence, Jagadish Gupta on 14/12/2002. Accused Rakambeer had gone
assigned to him on 25.2.2010. On the said date, he had written parcha no. 1 in which after copying the chik ... incident and prepared the site-plan, recovered one empty cartridge of 12 bore, one empty cartridge of 315 bore and took plain and blood stained
complainant and thereafter statement of the injured Manoj Kumar in Parcha no.3. After having found sufficient evidence and having arrested the accused, he submitted ... which the dead body of a boy of 12 years was kept whose name was disclosed to be Manoj Kumar and relatives of the deceased
many cartridges were recovered, he could not tell but in all 12 cartridges were shown to have been recovered. He has also not recorded ... also stated that he has not recorded the time of beginning any Parcha of this case nor of closing of any parcha. Parcha
found that the deceased was having a criminal history of more than 12 cases and as such the murder by any other person ... parcha No. 100 dated 15.10.2001.
The conduct of Investigating Agency is clear from Parcha No. 16 dated 17.11.2003, Parcha No. 17 dated 20.11.2003, Parcha
medical store of Farrukh for taking medicine of the said parcha but Farrukh was not there. The owner of the house (house in which shop ... about 50 paces away. His statement by I.O. was taken 12 to 13 days after the occurrence at police Chauki, where he was running
caused financial loss to the public exchequer to the tune of Rs. 12,46,969.55/-. Soon after the lodging of the said ... investigation proceeded in pursuance of the said F.I.R. and in parcha no. 16 dated 25.9.2006, it was recorded that no material was found
