establishment for all purposes. Their Lordships referred to the decision in
Parimal Chandra Raha v. LIC, 1995 Supp. (2) SCC 611 which was based ... decisions in M.M.R. Khan and others (supra) and Parimal
Chandra Raha (supra) had held that the employees were, in fact, the
employees
that, according to the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Parimal Chandra Raha & Ors. vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India ... reply, the learned counsel for the Management submitted that Parimal Chandra Raha 's case is not a case of a reference to an Industrial
Parimal Chandra Raha [Parimal
Chandra Raha v. LIC , 1995 Supp (2) SCC 611 : 1995
SCC (L&S) 983 : (1995) 30 ATC 282] to Harjinder
Khan Vs.Union of India 1990 Supp (l) SCC 191.
iii. Parimal Chandra Raha v. Life Insurance Corporation of India
1995 Supp ... were held to be the employees of the Railways.
7. In Parimal Chandra Raha (supra) a distinction was carved out between
an obligation
counsel for employees and reliance by them upon the decision in Parimal Chandra Raha & Ors. Vs. LIC & Ors. (supra) and stated that said
manner in which he shall do his work.
12. In Parimal Chandra Raha v. Life Insurance Corporation of India , 1995 (Supp
benefits which the, company gives to it regular employees.
8. In Parimal Chandra Raha & Ors. v. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Khan (supra).
iii. Parimal Chandra Raha v. Life Insurance Corporation of
India 1995 Supp (2) SCC 611.
iv. The Management of Reserve Bank of India ... were held
to be the employees of the Railways.
12. In Parimal Chandra Raha (supra) a distinction was carved out
between an obligation
Khan is fully
applicable. Attention was also invited to Parimal Chandra Raha v. Life
Insurance Corporation of India 1995 Supp ... were held to be the employees of the Railways.
26. In Parimal Chandra Raha (supra) a distinction was carved out between
an obligation
Khan is fully
applicable. Attention was also invited to Parimal Chandra Raha v. Life
Insurance Corporation of India 1995 Supp ... were held to be the employees of the Railways.
26. In Parimal Chandra Raha (supra) a distinction was carved out between
an obligation
