birth certificate Ext. PW-6/A and
the extract of parivar register Ext. PW-7/A were collected
rt
from Government Primary School and Gram ... Chand,
Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Cheeh copy of parivar
register Ext. PW-7/A. The remaining witnesses are police
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017
Pooja Devi was not mentioned. He also admitted
that copy of Parivar Register, in which details of his family
have been recorded is not correct ... recorded as 13.4.1997. He handed over the
extract of the Parivar Register on an application Ext. PW-11/B
moved by the police. The abstract
issued by the Secretary,
Gram Panchayat, Chamyana and copy of parivar
register Ext. PW-10/B, however, the same has erroneously
been ignored ... been claimed
below 16 years. It is the extract of parivar register Ext.
PW-10/B and the date of birth certificate
prosecutrix was determined as 17 years. A copy of Parivar register has been brought on record at page no. 70 wherein the year of birth ... test as well as the year of birth noted in the Parivar register, age of prosecutrix shown in her Class-VIII could not be believed
Counsel has also drawn the attention of the Court to the Parivar Register which has been annexed as Annexure-7 to the bail application. According ... date of birth of the girl Somwati is 2.6.1993. This Parivar Register relates to the village of the applicant and in the Parivar Register
that respondent No.4 has attained age of
majority, copy of Parivar Register has been placed on record. On
perusal of entry made ... copy of Parivar Register regarding the date
of birth, it is noticed that her date of birth has been mentioned as 31 st
April
victim to the police and also
supplied the abstract of the Parivar Register, according to which,
the date of birth of the child victim
stated that their marriage has also been entered in
Parivar Register of Gram Panchyat Kiling, Tehsil Chachoit, District
.
Mandi
prosecutrix is 10-10-1978. Similarly, in the extract of Parivar Register. Ext. PW 9/E, her date of birth is shown
Secretary Gram Panchayat,
Dugrain clearly suggests that entry made in the Parivar Register is not of
victim-prosecutrix and there is tampering on it. Lastly
