Ryots Of Garabandho vs Zemindar Of Parlakimedi on 10 May, 1943
Equivalent citations: (1945)47BOMLR525
JUDGMENT
Viscount Simon L.C., J.
1. This appeal ... India.
3. The appellants are ryots of three villages included in the Parlakimedi estate in the district of Ganjam in the Northern Circars. The respondents
lordships of the Privy Council is Ryots of Grabandho v. Zamindar of Parlakimedi this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the present petition ... lordships of the Privy Council in Ryots of Garbandho v. Zamindar of Parlakimedi (cit. sup.) to reach the above conclusion.
20. The learned Judges, however
Privy Council reported in -- 'Ryots of Garabandho v. Zemindar of Parlakimedi', (D) and these decisions are rested on the proposition that jurisdiction ... location within those territories."
Thereafter the learned Chief Justice referred to Parlakimedi 's case (D) and concluded by saying that they were unable
Lordships of the Privy Council in Ryots of Garrabandho v. Zemindar of Parlakimedi ... were that the appellants were ryots of three villages included, in the Parlakimedi estate in the district of Ganjam in the Northern Circara. The respondents
came to be considered in Ryots of Garabandho v. Zemindar of Parlakimedi ... decision of the Privy Council in Ryots of Garabandho v. Zemindar of Parlakimedi
Lordships of the Privy Council, in Ryots of Garabandho v. Zamindar of Parlakimedi
recent decision of this Board in Ryots of Garabandho v. Zemindar of Parlakimedi ... argument was not touched upon in the decision of this Board in Parlakimedi 's case.
10. It is clear that the appeal must succeed
State Of Maharashtra vs Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye on 17 November, 1980
Equivalent citations: (1981
Council on May 10, 1943, in Ryots of Garabandho v. Zamindar of Parlakimedi [1943] A.I.R. P.C. 164 was published. The question
Vijay Krishna Kumbhar vs The State Of Maharashtra & Others on 15 March, 1999
Equivalent
