alone (in the usual sense of substitution of one make of a product
for another) unless the resemblance between the goods is
extremely close ... Madras
High Court in the case of Parle Products Limited v. Bakemans
Industries Limited, 1998 (2) ARBLR 583 has held that;
"Had there been
alone (in the usual sense of substitution of one make of a product
for another) unless the resemblance between the goods is
extremely close ... Madras
High Court in the case of Parle Products Limited v. Bakemans
Industries Limited, 1998 (2) ARBLR 583 has held that;
"Had there been
Names, 9th Edn, was approvingly cited by the
Supreme Court, in Parle Products (P) Ltd v J.P. & Co.18 :
"Two marks, when ... Having reproduced the above passage from Kerly, the Supreme
Court, in Parle Products, went on to hold:
"9. It is, therefore, clear that
Messrs Parle Products Limited and
Messrs Parle Biscuits Limited is also a subsidiary
company of Messrs Parle Products Limited.
Therefore, the relationship between the appellant ... product of toothpaste is being sold to Messrs Parle
27
Biscuits Limited. Moreover, Messrs Parle Products
Limited are incurring the expenses for sales
promotion
delivered on 21st July, 1986 in Writ Petition No. 1362/1980, Parle Products Limited and another v. Union of India and another , does not seem ... This view was later on followed also by Jahagirdar, J. in Parle Products Limited (supra).
15. It may appear that a different view was taken
appellants has placed reliance on a judgment in the case of Parle
Products (P) Ltd Vs. J.P & Co. Mysore ... observations of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Parle Products (P) Ltd Vs. J.P &
Co. Mysore
Regional Director, Corporate Affairs, upholding an objection taken
by M/s Parle Products Private Limited that the name of the
petitioner's Company must ... Bharat
Gluco Industries Private Limited and the objector M/s Parle
Products Private Limited was complaining that the petitioner-
Company had an expression "Gluco
initially
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 14117/2010 (M/s. Parle Products
Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. ) was dismissed ... September,
2013.
Counsel submitted that the petitioner-M/s. Parle Products
Pvt. Ltd. preferred D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 916/2013
before this Court
initially
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 14117/2010 (M/s. Parle Products
Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. ) was dismissed ... September,
2013.
Counsel submitted that the petitioner-M/s. Parle Products
Pvt. Ltd. preferred D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 916/2013
before this Court
initially
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 14117/2010 (M/s. Parle Products
Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. ) was dismissed ... September,
2013.
Counsel submitted that the petitioner-M/s. Parle Products
Pvt. Ltd. preferred D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 916/2013
before this Court
