Shamlal And Ors. vs Parle'S Of Products Manufacturing ... on 6 April, 1966
Equivalent citations: (1966)2MLJ246, AIR 1967 MADRAS 116, (1966) 2 MADLJ246 ... registered proprietors of a reputed trade-mark consisting of the expression 'Parle's " under Mark No. 9202 which has acquired a great
Hornsby Ltd v. Zamindara
Engineering Co.7 ,
(vi) para 4 of Parle Products (P) Ltd v. J.P. & Co.8 ,
(vii) para ... Games Pvt Ltd11 ,
(x) para 77 of Intercontinental Great Brands v. Parle
Product Pvt Ltd12 and
(xi) para-67 of Cadbury India Ltd v. Neeraj
PepsiCo against
Parle, seeking a permanent injunction against Parle using the tagline
"For The Bold" in relation to its products, as PepsiCo holds ... label, were printed in bold red colour. The
impugned product of Parle is stated to have earned, through sales,
revenue of ₹ 184 crores during
Company Ltd. v. Philo 1996
( 3) L.L.N. 116 and Parle Products, Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee 2001 (I)
L.L.J. 964. The relevant ... vide supra), with which
we respectfully agree."
16. Parle Products, Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee [2001 (I) L.L.J.
964], was a case
Company Ltd. v. Philo , 1996
( 3) L.L.N. 116 and Parle Products Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee , 2001 (I)
L.L.J. 964. The relevant ... vide supra), with which
we respectfully agree."
16. Parle Products, Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee [2001 (I) L.L.J.
964], was a case
Supreme Court of India in a case reported in Parle Products v. J.P. & Co. Mysore , . In support of his contention ... Company ,
( 9) Roche & Company v. G. Manners & Company ,
( 10) Parle Products v. J.P. & Company Mysore ,
(11) M/s. Wockhardt Limited, Mumbai
lower Court has acted contrary to the principles adumbrated in Parle Products v. I.P. and Co. Mysore , wherein it has been categorically laid down ... Swaminathan, learned Counsel for the respondents, would draw my attention to Parle Products v. J.P. and Co. Mysore , and state that there cannot
Apex Court in Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta , Parle Products (P) Ltd., v. J.P. & Co and Cadila Health Care Ltd. v. Cadila ... Apex court in Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta , Parle Products (P) Ltd. v. J.P. & Co and Cadila Health Care Ltd. v. Cadila
reasonably
likely to cause a confusion between them."
30. In Parle Products (P) Ltd. v. J.P. & Co., Mysore ... aspect of deception and
confusion, the Court placed reliance upon Parle Products (supra) and
observed as under:
"36. Biscuits are normally stacked on shelves
decision of the Division Bench of this Court in
Parle Products Private Limited vs. Surya Food and Agro Limited
reported in MANU/TN/2109/2008 ... purpose of obtaining relief claimed in the Suit.
10. In Parle Products Private Limited (supra), it has been
http://www.judis.nic.in
11
held
