approvingly cited by the Supreme Court, in Parle
Products (P) Ltd v J.P. & Co.18 .
"Two marks, when placed side by side ... Having reproduced the above passage from Kerly, the
Supreme Court, in Parle products, went on to hold:
"9. It is, therefore, clear that
Company Ltd. v. Philo 1996
( 3) L.L.N. 116 and Parle Products, Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee 2001 (I)
L.L.J. 964. The relevant ... vide supra), with which
we respectfully agree."
16. Parle Products, Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee [2001 (I) L.L.J.
964], was a case
other appeal arises from the suit filed by Parle
Products Limited to enforce its rights in respect of its trade mark
"GLUCO" registered ... refused to grant interim relief
in favour of the plaintiff - Parle Products Limited. The defendant,
therefore, contended that in such a situation the Supreme Court
added the same. As held by the Supreme Court in Parle Products (P) Ltd. Vs. J.P. & Co., Mysore , :-
"Moreover, variations in detail ... with for reasons of their own."
The Supreme Court in Parle Products also held as under :
8."According to Kerlys Law of Trade
delivered by a Single Judge of this Court (Jahagirdar, J) in Parle Products Limited and Another v. Union of India and Another , which ... decisions of the Supreme Court in the said two cases (Parle Products Limited and Shalimar Textile Mfg. Pvt. Ltd.) was binding in it as held
similar circumstances, in the judgment reported in (1972) 1 SCC 618 (Parle Products (P) Ltd. v J.P. and Co., Mysore, has observed as follows ... Amritadhara" and "Lakshmandhara"]
(c) 1972 (1) SCC 618 (Parle Products (P) Ltd., Vs. J.P. and Co., Mysore) ["Gluco Biscuits
this submission, the learned counsel relied on the following authorities:
1. Parle Products v. J. P. & Co., Mysore ,
.
2. A. V. Rajadurai Nadar ... also been copied. In this connection, the learned counsel relied on Parle Products v. J. P. & Co., Mysore, ; A. Shanmugha Mudaliar v. A. Abdul
Corn Products Refining Co. v. Shangrila Food Products Ltd. , reported in AIR 1960 SC 142 and Parle Products ... disregard the parts which are common.
30. In the case of Parle Products (P) Ltd. , (supra), which considered the case of the appellant pertaining
PARLE PRODUCTS P. LTD. V. J.P. & CO., MYSORE );
(vi)2004 (1) CTMR 86 (MIDAS HYGIENE INDUSTRIES P. LTD. AND ANOTHER V. SUDDIN BHATIA ... decisions of this Court reported in 2007 (35) PTC 542 (MAD) ( PARLE PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. V. SURYA FOOD & AGRO
counsel for the respondent also cited the three decisions reported in Parle Products Limited v. Bakemans Industries Limited., 1998 (3)L.W. 294. Wander Limited ... Karuppanna Nadar for his matches.
16. In the decision reported in Parle Products (P) Ltd.. v. J.P. & Co.. Mysore , again the question
