Intercontinental Great Brands vs Parle Product Private Limited on 10 February, 2023
Author: C. Hari Shankar
Bench: C. Hari Shankar
Neutral Citation Number : 2023 ... Nancy Roy, Mr.Abhishek Kotnala and
Ms.Jyotideep Kaur, Advs.
versus
PARLE PRODUCT PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant
Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv.
with
Intercontinental Great Brands Llc vs Parle Product Private Limited on 3 November, 2023
Author: C.Hari Shankar
Bench: C.Hari Shankar
$~8
* IN THE HIGH ... Aastha
Kakkar, Ms. Yashi Agarwal and Mr.
Abhinav Bhalla, Advs.
versus
PARLE PRODUCT PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant
Through Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Mr. Bikash
Ghorai
Parle Products Pvt Ltd & Anr vs M/S B&B Bake Pvt Ltd on 20 November, 2019
Author: Najmi Waziri
Bench: Najmi Waziri ... completely different product. The brand
name itself is a distinguishing feature and identifies the origin of the product
from the hose of PARLE. The Respondent
Names, 9th Edn, was approvingly cited by the
Supreme Court, in Parle Products (P) Ltd v J.P. & Co.18 :
"Two marks, when ... Having reproduced the above passage from Kerly, the Supreme
Court, in Parle Products, went on to hold:
"9. It is, therefore, clear that
Company Ltd. v. Philo 1996
( 3) L.L.N. 116 and Parle Products, Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee 2001 (I)
L.L.J. 964. The relevant ... vide supra), with which
we respectfully agree."
16. Parle Products, Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee [2001 (I) L.L.J.
964], was a case
Hornsby Ltd v. Zamindara
Engineering Co.7 ,
(vi) para 4 of Parle Products (P) Ltd v. J.P. & Co.8 ,
(vii) para ... Games Pvt Ltd11 ,
(x) para 77 of Intercontinental Great Brands v. Parle
Product Pvt Ltd12 and
(xi) para-67 of Cadbury India Ltd v. Neeraj
PepsiCo against
Parle, seeking a permanent injunction against Parle using the tagline
"For The Bold" in relation to its products, as PepsiCo holds ... label, were printed in bold red colour. The
impugned product of Parle is stated to have earned, through sales,
revenue of ₹ 184 crores during
Company Ltd. v. Philo 1996
( 3) L.L.N. 116 and Parle Products, Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee 2001 (I)
L.L.J. 964. The relevant ... vide supra), with which
we respectfully agree."
16. Parle Products, Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee [2001 (I) L.L.J.
964], was a case
Company Ltd. v. Philo , 1996
( 3) L.L.N. 116 and Parle Products Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee , 2001 (I)
L.L.J. 964. The relevant ... vide supra), with which
we respectfully agree."
16. Parle Products, Ltd. v. Subir Mukherjee [2001 (I) L.L.J.
964], was a case
reasonably
likely to cause a confusion between them."
30. In Parle Products (P) Ltd. v. J.P. & Co., Mysore ... aspect of deception and
confusion, the Court placed reliance upon Parle Products (supra) and
observed as under:
"36. Biscuits are normally stacked on shelves
