Parle Products Pvt Ltd & vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 4 December, 2015
Author: Akil Kureshi
Bench: Akil Kureshi , Mohinder ... GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20023 of 2015
==========================================================
PARLE PRODUCTS PVT LTD & 1....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 2....Respondent
alone (in the usual sense of substitution of one make of a product
for another) unless the resemblance between the goods is
extremely close ... Madras
High Court in the case of Parle Products Limited v. Bakemans
Industries Limited, 1998 (2) ARBLR 583 has held that;
"Had there been
alone (in the usual sense of substitution of one make of a product
for another) unless the resemblance between the goods is
extremely close ... Madras
High Court in the case of Parle Products Limited v. Bakemans
Industries Limited, 1998 (2) ARBLR 583 has held that;
"Had there been
defendant."
58. The principle was reiterated and applied in Parle Products (P.) Ltd. v. J.P. & Co. Mysore
held that the plaintiffs were entitled to injunction.
In Parle Products v. J.P. & Co. Mysore (AIR 1972 SC 1359), the question before
Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah, reported in
2002 (3) SCC 65;
3. Parle Products P. Ltd. V. J.P. & Co. Mysore , reported
entered into between the parties i.e. Parle Products, GBC
was bottling the different products of Parle i.e. Gold Spot, Thums
Union of India , AIR 1987 SC 447; Union of India v. Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. , AIR 1994 SC 106.
He has also referred
decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel and Ors. reported in 2006 (7) Supreme ... Ruston & Hornsby Ltd. v. The Zamindara Engineering Co. ]
83. In Parle Products (P) Ltd. v. J.P. And Co., Mysore , emphasis was laid
products which are sold or of the technology by which the products are manufactured, and the user of such products are, therefore, not likely ... decision of the Madras High Court in the case of Parle Products Limited v. Bakemans Industries Limited, 1998 Patent and Trademarks Cases, 662 (Madras) wherein
