parole to the appellant.
2) The appellant had submitted an application for grant of regular
parole for twenty days before the District Parole Advisory
Committee ... ground that it did not have the jurisdiction to
entertain parole for TADA prisoners. This action of the Advisory
Committee was challenged by the appellant
made in the impugned order and further to release him on
parole for a period of three months on furnishing personal
bond/security bond ... that the
first respondent along with 20 other accused was tried in
TADA Cases Nos. 2, 7 of 1993 and 2 of 1994. The
Designated
learned counsel for the parties.
Leave granted.
The appellant had applied for parole which was
rejected by the Jail authorities against which a writ
petition ... under the provisions of Terrorist and
Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (" TADA
Act "). However, it is also a fact that the appellant
Jasbir Singh @ Jassa vs The State Of Punjab on 9 December, 2021
Bench: Uday Umesh
designated TADA Court,
Chennai praying for effective monitoring of the pending
investigation of the assassination. The said petition was
dismissed by the TADA Court ... Governor. During the course of hearing of applications
filed for parole, the High Court was informed that the
Governor has not taken a decision
parole twice earlier and
there was no complaint about his conduct during his
release. We are also informed that the applicant is
on parole ... released on
bail, subject to the satisfaction of the Designated
Special TADA Court, Chennai. In addition, the
applicant shall report to the Jolarpet Police
Station
R.D.Upadhyay vs State Of A.P on 13 November, 2014
Bench: T.S
