years
undergoing imprisonment or (Twenty four years)
who absconded while on parole
or furlough
7......................
The Resolution dated 15th March, 2010 is also
placed ... cover grave offences, such as life
imprisonment under stringent laws like TADA,
MCOCA, POTA, etc. Therefore, in exercise of
power vested in it under Section
years
undergoing imprisonment or (Twenty four years)
who absconded while on parole
or furlough
7......................
The Resolution dated 15th March, 2010 is also
placed ... cover grave offences, such as life
imprisonment under stringent laws like TADA,
MCOCA, POTA, etc. Therefore, in exercise of
power vested in it under Section
Rule 13 of Rule 4 of the Prisons
(Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, were fully
applicable to the petitioner therein. Such ... suffering punishment for any act under the
provisions of TADA. The ground that there is no
recommendation of the Jail Superintendent is also
unsustainable
Rule 13 of Rule 4 of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough
and Parole) Rules, 1959, were fully applicable to the
::: Uploaded on - 16/03/2018 ::: Downloaded ... petitioner is not suffering
punishment for any act under the provisions of TADA.
So far as last ground, that there is no
recommendation of Jail
Rule 13 of
Rule 4 of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole)
Rules, 1959, were fully applicable to the petitioner
therein. In the present case ... suffering punishment for any act under the provisions
of TADA. The last ground, that there is no
recommendation of Jail Superintendent is also not
tenable
Rule 13 of Rule 4 of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough
and Parole) Rules, 1959, were fully applicable to the
petitioner therein. Such ... petitioner is not suffering punishment for any
act under the provisions of TADA. The last ground,
that there is no recommendation of Jail
Superintendent
Rule 13 of
Rule 4 of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole)
Rules, 1959, were fully applicable to the petitioner
therein. Such ... petitioner is not suffering
punishment for any act under the provisions of TADA.
Similarly, the ground that there is no recommendation
of Jail Superintendent
Rule 13 of Rule 4 of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough
and Parole) Rules, 1959, were fully applicable to the
petitioner therein. Such ... petitioner is not suffering
punishment for any act under the provisions of TADA.
The last ground, that there is no recommendation of
Jail Superintendent
Rule 13 of
Rule 4 of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole)
Rules, 1959 were fully applicable to the petitioner
therein. Such ... petitioner is not suffering
punishment for any act under the provisions of TADA.
So far as the last ground, that there is no
recommendation
Rule 13 of Rule 4 of the Prisons
(Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, were fully
applicable to the petitioner therein. In the instant
case ... petitioner is not suffering punishment for
any act under the provisions of TADA. The last
ground, that there is no recommendation of Jail
Superintendent
