parole to the appellant.
2) The appellant had submitted an application for grant of regular
parole for twenty days before the District Parole Advisory
Committee ... ground that it did not have the jurisdiction to
entertain parole for TADA prisoners. This action of the Advisory
Committee was challenged by the appellant
months when he was on
parole on medical grounds. The minimum sentence under
Section 6 of the TADA Act is only five years.
The appellant
discussions made in the
impugned order and further to release him on parole for a period of three
months on furnishing personal bond/security bond ... that the first
respondent along with 20 other accused was tried in TADA Cases Nos. 2, 7 of
1993 and 2 of 1994. The Designated
Sube Singh vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 3 February, 2006
Equivalent citations: 2006
The Home Secretary (Prison) vs H. Nilofer Nisha on 23 January, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Shri Rama Murthy vs State Of Karnataka on 23 December, 1996
Equivalent citations: AIR 1997
Salil Bali vs Union Of India & Anr on 17 July, 2013
Equivalent citations: AIR
Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Mohd.Parvez Abdul Kayuum on 5 July, 2019
Equivalent citations
Bilkis Yakub Rasool vs Union Of India on 8 January, 2024
Author: B.V. Nagarathna
State Of Gujarat vs Gadhvi Rambhai Nathabhai on 20 June, 1994
Equivalent citations: 1994 SCC
