Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1580 (1.24 seconds)

Shakuntala vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 October, 2025

parole period stands firmly established. Once the petitioner had availed parole and subsequently secured an extension of 60 days, she was bound by the conditions ... effectuating parole release orders: Mandatory Briefing: 14. At the time of release on parole, the Jail Superintendent or the designated parole officer shall mandatorily brief
Karnataka High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Laxmandas vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 December, 2025

first parole and for 40 days on third parole provided his behaviour has been good during the second parole. If during the third parole also ... denying the grant of parole. Parole cannot be dined merely because no guardian is available or no residence to parole. This approach disregards the principles
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next