short question that arises in this appeal is whether
any parol evidence can be let in to substantiate a
subsequent oral arrangement rescinding or modifying ... defendant-appellant cannot be
proved by the parol evidence. Such a evidence is not
admissible in evidence.
The learned counsel for the appellant then urged
appeals is as to whether between the parties to the transactions parol evidence is admissible to prove that the documents, which on their face appear ... appeal, should have realised that the onus of proving by parol evidence -- even when permissible in law -- that the document is not what it purports
Indian Evidence Act, Ex.A1-sale deed and the recitals thereon is the best evidence. Under Sec.92 of Indian Evidence Act, no oral ... appreciate the evidence and rival contentions in the light of Sec.92 of Indian Evidence Act. Since parol evidence contradicting the terms
origin, entitled to a
much higher degree of credit than parol evidence. It is of policy
because it would be attended with great mischief ... question that arises for consideration is as to
whether any parol evidence can be let in to substantiate subsequent
oral arrangement rescinding or modifying
proceeded broadly on what can be described
as 'parole evidence' as it has travelled outside the written
contract;
d) AT erred in dismissing ... parole evidence. It is also to be noticed that
proviso 4 to Section 92 of ' Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ' (' Evidence
question that arises for consideration is
as to whether any parol evidence can be let in to
substantiate subsequent oral arrangement rescinding or
modifying ... property is by law required to be in
writing.
(iii) No parol evidence can be let in to substantiate any
subsequent oral arrangement which
question that arises
for consideration is as to whether any parol
evidence can be let in to substantiate subsequent
oral arrangement rescinding or modifying ... parol evidence, especially
when the contract is a registered document. Section 92 of the
Evidence Act prohibits the admission of oral evidence to
contradict, vary
rescinding the said contract or
disposition can be substantiated by
parol evidence and such evidence is
admissible. Thus if a party has
entered into ... oral contract and
it can be substantiated by parol
evidence. In such kind of cases the
oral evidence can be let into prove that
question that arises for consideration
is as to whether any parol evidence can be let in to
substantiate subsequent oral arrangement rescinding or
modifying ... property is by law required to be in writing.
(iii) No parol evidence can be let in to substantiate any
subsequent oral arrangement which
question that arises for consideration
is as to whether any parol evidence can be let in to
substantiate subsequent oral arrangement rescinding or
modifying ... property is by law required to be in writing.
(iii) No parol evidence can be let in to substantiate any
subsequent oral arrangement which
