with a written contract, the law of this country absolutely prohibits parol evidence being given except within the limits very carefully laid down in Section ... agreement or contract not under seal, the obligor might not give parol evidence to evade his liability even though the facts upon which he relied
rescinding the said contract or disposition can be substantiated by parol evidence and such evidence is admissible. Thus if a party has entered into ... oral contract and it can be substantiated by parol evidence. In such kind of cases the oral evidence can be let in to prove that
subsequent oral agreement modifying the said
desposition can be substituted by parole evidence, and therefore,
the said evidence is admissible, therefore, once the Court ... require to be registered. The same can be
substituted by parole evidence. Learned advocate for the
defendant has relied on the judgment reported
property is by law required to be in writing.
(iii) No parol evidence can be let in to substantiate any subsequent oral arrangement which ... rescinding the said contract or disposition can be substantiated by parol evidence and such evidence is admissible. Thus if a party has entered into
question that arises for
consideration is as to whether any parol evidence
can be let in to substantiate subsequent oral
arrangement rescinding or modifying ... property is
by law required to be in writing.
(iii) No parol evidence can be let in to
substantiate any subsequent oral
arrangement which
Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pty ... vs Mmtc Ltd. on 17 December, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
because it would only mean that ordinarily in a petition parole evidence can be given but that can be departed from by permitting party ... action commenced by a writ. Ordinarily, in such proceedings parole evidence is generally avoided. Where disputed questions of fact arise in a proceedings before
parties. (See McKelvey's Evidence, p. 294.) As
observed in Greenlear's Evidence, p. 563, one of the most
common and important ... origin, entitled to a
much higher degree of credit than parol evidence. It is of policy
because it would be attended with great mischief
Dalim Kumar Sain And Ors. vs Smt. Nandarani Dassi And Anr. on 20 August, 1969
V.B.C. Industries Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 23 August, 1993
