P. Manavala Chetty And Five Ors. vs P. Ramanujam Chetty And Anr. on 25 January, 1966
writing and it cannot, consistently with this doctrine, permit parol evidence or evidence of collateral circumstances to be adduced to contradict
Search Results Page
Search Results
131 - 140 of 9667 (2.43 seconds)Subba Narayana Vathiyar And Ors. vs K. Ramasami Aiyar on 28 September, 1906
work, where it is said to have been held that parol evidence is not admissible to show that a note was to be paid
Maung Kyin vs Ma Shwe La on 26 July, 1917
fraud to insist on the conveyance as being absolute, and parole evidence must he admissible to prove the fraud.
12. In the opinion of their
Venkatadri Appa Rao vs Parthasarathi Appa Rao on 30 January, 1925
ordinary acceptation of the words used, with the assistance of such parol evidence of the surrounding circumstances as is admissible, to place the Court
Ram Ranjan Chakerbati vs Ram Narain Singh And Ors. on 8 December, 1894
possession. On the other hand, the appellant has given neither statement nor evidence as to when or how his title had its origin. The only ... rent, and there are other considerations to be found in the parol evidence, and specially referred to in the judgment of the Judge of first
Kartongen Kemi Och Forvaltning Ab And ... vs State Through Cbi on 4 February, 2004
Kartongen Kemi Och Forvaltning Ab And ... vs State Through Cbi on 4 February, 2004
Equivalent
Perumal Chettiar vs Kamakshi Ammal on 10 February, 1938
from evidence under Section 49 of the Registration Act was nevertheless a written contract in the sense that its existence precluded oral evidence ... England that admissions by a party, even when proved by parol evidence, constitute an exception to the 'best evidence' rule (see Singleton
Harbans vs Om Prakash And Ors on 10 November, 2005
equity judges. That end has
always been to ascertain, by parol evidence if need be, the real
nature and substance of the transaction
Haryana State Industrial Development ... vs M/S Cork Manufacturing Co on 27 August, 2007
original allottee Om Parkash
Saharan had not even come forward to give evidence on
behalf of the plaintiff. It was a clear case for drawing ... case on hand. At least, it should have seen that parole
evidence to alter the terms of a written instrument was not
permissible
Mukesh Kumar vs Smt. Kamlesh Devi & Ors on 11 May, 2011
present case, the
well settled position of law is that no oral evidence contrary to that
can be referred to. In other words, the subsequent ... returned the offending
vehicle to the appellant, cannot be proved by parol evidence. Section
91 of the Indian Evidence Act deals with the exclusion