submitted, the respondent should not have been
permitted to lead parole evidence in support of the contention. Section
91 of the Evidence Act provides that ... evidence u/s 92 of Indian Evidence Act. But, the said principle of
law is not applicable where parole evidence is sought
submitted, the respondent should not
have been permitted to lead parole evidence in support of the
contention. Section 91 of the Evidence Act provides that ... received in
evidence u/s 92 of Indian Evidence Act. But, the said principle of
law is not applicable where parole evidence is sought
modified or altered or substituted by oral
contract or disposition. No parol evidence will be admissible to substantiate
such an oral contract or disposition ... alteration
or substitution of such written document is permissible by parol evidence and it
is only by another written document the terms of earlier written
submitted,
the respondent should not have been permitted to lead parole
evidence in support of the contention. Section 91 of the
Evidence Act provides that ... Trial Court was right in
permitting the respondent to lead parole evidence in support
of her plea that the sale deed dated January
either, (1) by
actual deposit of title-deeds, in which case parole evidence
is admissible to show the meaning of the deposit and the
extent ... security may be
established by written documents, alone or
coupled with parol evidence; by parol evidence
only that the deposit was made
recited in the deed and that such proof be parol evidence was barred by Section 92 as consideration is one of the terms ... liberty to show what the real consideration was and parol evidence could be given of the real nature of the transactions. What the first party
existence of a particular relationship may be shown by parol evidence , tough the terms which govern that relationship appear to be in writing ... tenancy, this fact may be proved by any competent parol evidence , such as payment of rent, or the testimony of a witness who has seen
place any reliance on any proviso to Section 92 , Evidence Act.
20. Tukaram v. Jaganath ... considered as a perfect agreement which could be enforced, parol evidence is inadmissible to alter or add to its terms unless it falls within
Ramayya or whether it can be disregarded altogether and parol evidence admitted to prove a division in status or partition. First of all, does this ... existence of a particular relationship may be shown by parol evidence, though the terms which govern such relationship appear to be in writing...The fact
defendants are not at liberty to contradict the writing by parol evidence. The clause in the deed of assignment referring to the terms ... Evidence Act, the defendant is not entitled to seek to adduce parol evidence to contradict this term of the contract reduced to writing between
