Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

parole evidence, contrary to the admittedly made signatures by him, rather on the contract of sale, as the above oral evidence, or parole evidence

petitioner for the grant of parole in the light of the relevant facts and evidence, if any, for which he is entitled for under ... petitioner for the grant of the parole in the light of relevant facts and evidence, if any, and also under the relevant provisions

years imprisonment along with remissions. However, the period spent on parole by the life convict, is to be excluded from the above spell ... prison, became evidently spent in prison by the life convict, along with remissions, but excluding the period spent on parole, a perusal of the custody

influencing the witnesses or tampering with the evidence even when he was released on furlough/parole for a few weeks in the said conviction. Apart

That it is pertinent to mention here that the after seeking parole by the petitioner from this Hon'ble Court, the petitioner was actively ... petitioner has filed the petition for parole on ground to create false evidence." 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded

conduct being not satisfactory during the period when he availed the last parole, no details have been mentioned. Counsel for the U.T. Chandigarh ... forth by the petitioner for grant of parole, the decision being based upon no evidence, the impugned order dated 15.07.2022 (Annexure P-4) passed

petitioner being granted parole. The reason for making the afore conclusion becomes drawn from the factum, that there is no tangible evidence to support ... would become breached, upon, the petitioner being granted parole, however, since there was no tangible evidence to support the afore apprehension. Therefore, the rejection

made by the Competent Authority, upon his application, for parole, to enable him to meet his family. 2. A perusal of the order challenged before ... Officer concerned, supporting his objection to the parole claim of the petitioner, rather upon valid, and, tangible evidence. 4. Be that as it may, since

whereby parole application of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that he had already availed the stipulated period of parole and therefore ... move an appropriate application supported by the medical evidence to substantiate his contention for grant of parole. If such a representation/application is moved

case of prosecution is that petitioner - accused Sarwan Ram was released on parole on 06.02.2012 for four weeks as per the orders of Higher Authorities ... staying his parole for a period of 2 years, 3 months and 12 days. 3. Thereafter, prosecution adduced its pre-charge evidence and after appreciation