institutions of the
dependents of the convict;
It is evident that the petitioner has sought parole, while seeking
coverage of his prayer under clause ... supposed to
disturb social peace.
However, it is evident that while the petitioner enjoyed his
earlier parole, which was granted
released on parole vide
order Ex. P63 and was to report back in jail on 17.02.2008.
Apart from the above oral evidence, there were other
State counsel while opposing the grant of parole
submits that in case the petitioner is granted parole, he might get
involved in drug smuggling ... parole, are also one of the
reasons for declining parole. However, the above apprehension is not
founded upon any credible and tangible evidence. Therefore, since
given by both the petitioners (Annexure R-1) and this is
evident from the release order of the District Magistrate, Hisar
(Annexures ... Narender on an earlier occasion
when he had misused the concession of parole. However, keeping in
view that the accused was arrested
dealt with a similar case and granted the petitioner two weeks'
parole on his furnishing requisite bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Duty ... seeking parole on account of delivery of his wife but the
petitioner has not completed one year of sentence. This Court granted him
parole
presently residing in village
Karsola, P.S. Julana, District Jind. It is evident from Annexure R-II of the
reply that Usha is living alone ... falls under
the category of Hard Core Prisoner as per Haryana Govt. Parole Act Para 2
(aa) (2) and has not completed 05 years imprisonment
Jatinder Kumar @ Bawa vs State Of Punjab And Others on 2 August, 2013
Author: Ritu
Gopal Ganesh vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 8 September, 2014
Author: Ritu Bahri
Gurnam Singh vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 11 September, 2014
Author: Ritu Bahri
Jaspal Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 12 November, 2013
Author
