Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (for short 'the Act'), parol evidence could not be relied upon to explain the ambiguity in the exchange deed ... debarring the exclusion of oral evidence. According to the learned counsel, parol evidence is admissible if it is adduced to explain a latent ambiguity
further pointed out that no inference could be drawn by leading parole evidence under Section 91 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (for brevity ... other argument raised by the learned counsel that no parole evidence under Section 91 of the Act could be produced, has also not impressed
parole evidence, contrary to the admittedly made signatures by him, rather on
the contract of sale, as the above oral evidence, or parole evidence
held by the King's Bench Division that parol evidence was admissible to show that the sum mentioned in the entry included the debt
found appellant-Ikram as the real culprit. To my mind, his
evidence is as vague as it could be and if he came ... record and for which no reason/explanation is forthcoming. His parole
evidence cannot be even considered much less believed. On the contrary,
the trial Court
supra) as well as Smt. Bismillah 's case (supra), it becomes evident that in the present case, the document envisaged by Maya Bai plaintiff ... evidence is excluded when there is an agreement in writing. The parole evidence rule is well entrenched in Section 92 of the Act which
English and American cases which allow parol evidence to be admitted to show that the nature of the transaction is different from what it appears ... this case as there is no cogent and convincing parol evidence and at the Bar the plaintiff's case has been canvassed
suspicion and does not
constitute misconduct but if there is tangible parol evidence based on honest
reconstruction of events leading to misconduct then the hairline
male species because the only available witnesses who can give direct evidence of this fact are the parties to the marriage themselves. When a dispute ... relevant circumstances is available, it affords a good background in which parol evidence may be considered. The evidence led by the parties will have
alteration of the terms of an agreement reduced in
writing by parole evidence is inadmissible by virtue of Section 92 of the
Evidence
