property is by law required to be in writing.
(iii) No parol evidence can be let in to substantiate any subsequent oral arrangement which ... rescinding the said contract or disposition can be substantiated by parol evidence and such evidence is admissible. Thus if a party has entered into
rescinding the said contract or
disposition can be substantiated by parol evidence and such
evidence is admissible. Thus if a party has entered into ... oral contract and it can be substantiated
by parol evidence. In such kind of cases the oral evidence can be
let in to prove that
rescinding the said contract or
disposition can be substantiated by parol evidence and such
evidence is admissible. Thus if a party has entered into ... oral contract and it can be substantiated
by parol evidence. In such kind of cases the oral evidence can be
let in to prove that
rescinding the said contract or disposition can be substantiated by parol evidence and such evidence is admissible. Thus if a party has entered into ... oral contract and it can be substantiated by parol evidence. In such kind of cases the oral evidence can be let in to prove that
parties has held that, the defendant is not entitled to lead
parole evidence against the recitals in the agreement for sale and the
defendant ... plaintiff. He has also
contended that the parole evidence could not be lead in this case against
the contention of the written argument
modified or altered or substituted by oral
contract or disposition. No parol evidence will be admissible to substantiate
such an oral contract or disposition ... alteration
or substitution of such written document is permissible by parol evidence and it
is only by another written document the terms of earlier written
registered document can be altered,
rescinded or varied by way of parol evidence, in view of
second part of proviso (4) to Section ... untenable and it is not permissible to lead parole evidence
contrary to the registered document under Section 92
proviso (4) of the Indian Evidence
registered document can be altered,
rescinded or varied by way of parol evidence, in view of
second part of proviso (4) to Section ... untenable and it is not permissible to lead parole evidence
contrary to the registered document under Section 92
proviso (4) of the Indian Evidence
submitted, the respondent should not have been
permitted to lead parole evidence in support of the
contention. Section 91 of the Evidence Act provides that ... Trial Court was
right in permitting the respondent to lead parole evidence
in support of her plea that the sale deed dated January
Indian Evidence Act, 1882 (Evidence Act ) the
SPA can be proved only by document itself or by secondary evidence of its
contents where ... settled that when entire
agreement clause is found in the contract, parole evidence stands excluded and
reliance is this regard is placed on judgment
