Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.60 seconds)

Vimla Devi vs State Of Raj on 26 September, 2012

availed 20 days first regular parole in accordance with the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 (for short 'the Rules ... treated as a petition claiming parole. We have considered all the facts of the case including that the District Parole Advisory Committee after taking into
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jakir Hussain vs State Of Raj on 8 August, 2012

petitioner is claiming first regular parole as per the provisions of Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules ... parole petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to release the convict Jakir Hussain S/o Abdul Sattar on parole in accordance with the Rules
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - G Mathur - Full Document

Bharat Lal vs State Of Raj on 5 September, 2012

also availed first regular parole and an emergent parole as per the provisions of Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 (hereinafter referred ... stated, the petitioner has already availed first parole and en emergent parole in accordance with the Rules of 1958. From perusal of the remarks made
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Paras vs State Of Raj on 19 November, 2012

days as on 31.10.2012. He availed first parole in accordance with the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 (for short 'the Rules ... regular parole. We have considered all the facts of the case including the fact that the District Parole Advisory Committee, Jalore awarded regular parole
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - G Mathur - Full Document

Shahjad vs State Of Raj on 26 September, 2012

September, 2012 Bench: Govind Mathur , R.S.Chauhan -1- DBCivil (Parole) Writ Petition No.8820/2012 Shahzad v. State of Rajasthan Date of Order :: 26th September ... Rules of 1972") has not been forwarded to the competent authority being having an -2- impediment as per Rule 3(m) of the Rules
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1