Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 60 (0.56 seconds)

Manglavat Bai vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 13 August, 2024

Distt. - Sarnangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Chandrabhushan Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Sangharsh Pandey ... Sadhuram, r/o Mudpar, Tahsil Bilaigarh for her release on parole for 14 days. 7. Recently in the matter of Shor Vs State of UP decided
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - R Sinha - Full Document

Bhupendra Ratnakar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 13 August, 2024

District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, C.G. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Chandrabhushan Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Sangharsh Pandey ... respondent no.3 and order may kindly be passed for temporary release/parole of the petitioner for 14 days. (iii) To grant any other relief
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - R Sinha - Full Document

Vedvyas @ Badu Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 29 July, 2024

Kotwali Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Rajni Soren, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt ... justice." 3. The petitioner's application for grant of leave (parole) has been rejected by the respondent No.3 District Magistrate, Gariyaband, District
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R Sinha - Full Document

Ramchandra vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 29 July, 2024

Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt ... petitioner." 3. The petitioner's application for grant of leave (parole) has been rejected by the respondent No.3 Collector-cum District Magistrate
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R Sinha - Full Document

Keshav Shukla vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 30 November, 2023

Superintendent, Central Jail Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Rishi Rahul Soni, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Vikram ... petitioner." 3. The petitioner's application for grant of leave (parole) was rejected by the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - R Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next