Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 185 (0.75 seconds)

Sripat Marandi vs State Of Jharkhand on 10 December, 2012

allegation of misuse of liberty during the  period the accused­respondent was granted parole. 8.   The   learned   Sessions   Judge,   Gurgaon   by   a   judgment dated ... execution  of  sentence.  The mere fact   that during the period of parole the accused has not   misused   the   liberties   does   not   per   se   warrant   suspension
Jharkhand High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

Dilip Murmu vs State Of Jharkhand on 19 December, 2012

allegation  of   misuse   of   liberty   during   the   period   the   accused­ respondent was granted parole.  8.   The   learned   Sessions   Judge,   Gurgaon   by   a   judgment dated ... execution   of   sentence.   The   mere   fact   that during the period of parole the accused has not   misused   the   liberties   does   not   per   se   warrant   suspension
Jharkhand High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

Kamakhya Narayan Giri vs The State Of Jharkhand on 19 December, 2012

allegation  of   misuse   of   liberty   during   the   period   the   accused­ respondent was granted parole.  8.   The   learned   Sessions   Judge,   Gurgaon   by   a   judgment dated ... execution   of   sentence.   The   mere   fact   that during the period of parole the accused has not   misused   the   liberties   does   not   per   se   warrant   suspension
Jharkhand High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

Ma-Hadeo Singh vs State Of Jharkhand on 6 November, 2012

allegation  of   misuse   of   liberty   during   the   period   the   accused­ respondent was granted parole.  8.   The   learned   Sessions   Judge,   Gurgaon   by   a   judgment dated ... execution   of   sentence.   The   mere   fact   that during the period of parole the accused has not   misused   the   liberties   does   not   per   se   warrant   suspension
Jharkhand High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

State vs . Raj Kumar Sharma, Etc. on 8 October, 2012

order will dispose of an application dated nil for releasing accused Om Prakash on parole for a period of three months. 2. I have heard ... just, fair and appropriate to release the accused Om Prakash on parole at this stage. Therefore, his application for release on parole is dismissed. Announced
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next