Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Sri Vishwaraj vs B M Byrappa on 1 March, 2013 Author: Aravind Kumar Bench: Aravind

properties in a suit for partition would not be maintainable for partial partition. In support of his submissions, he would rely upon following two judgments ... partition of the shares of the members of the joint family in one property which amounts to partial partition is not maintainable. this contention

having not been included in the suit, suit for partial partition 10 was not maintainable and to evidence the fact that said property was purchased ... cannot be any dispute to the preposition that suit for partial partition is not maintainable and all joint family properties are to be included

deceased Basappa towards first defendant came to be denied and prayer for partition of suit schedule property sought for by way of alternate relief also ... included in the suit and as such, suit for partial partition as contended is not maintainable. 6 Defendants-2 and 3 though represented by their

Whether the plaintiffs prove that they are entitled for partition and separate possession of ½ share in the suit schedule properties? vi. What order or decree ... included in the hotchpot, therefore suit for partial partition in respect of a alienated property is not maintainable by relying upon the judgment reported

such it has held that suit for partial partition would not be maintainable and all the properties belonging to the family is to be included

suit for partial partition. In the absence of such permission being sought for and granted, the subsequent suit is not maintainable. Order 2 Rule ... this proceeds as an assumption that the earlier suit for partial partition was not maintainable. The effect of filing a suit for partition without including

partition amongst his brothers in the year 1980. However, it was contended that during the life time to Sri Shivamurthappa, there was a partition ... Will dated 25.01.1999. He also contended that suit for partial partition is not maintainable on the ground that site No.95 which was purchased

Smt A C Nagaveni vs Smt Akkamma on 3 May, 2017 Equivalent citations: AIR 2017

Bellur Usha Shivaprasad vs Smt. Sarasamba Anantha Swamy on 2 June, 2020 Author: Aravind Kumar