necessary parties
in the suit. Thus, the suit is not maintainable for partial
partition and without their being necessary parties. Against
the decision ... facts and circumstances
involved in the case, the suit is maintainable for
partial partition and non impleading necessary
parties
Therefore, the suit filed for partial partition is not
maintainable. Hence, prayed to allow the appeal.
13. On the other hand, learned counsel for
respondent ... included in the suit; therefore, the suit filed for partial
partition is not maintainable. In this regard, defendant
Nos.1 to 5 took a pleading
partition and
separate possession was filed without including all the joint
properties. Hence, the suit for partition and separate
possession is not maintainable for partial
these properties are not included hence,
the suit filed for partial partition is not maintainable. Therefore,
the appellants/defendants pray to allow the appeal
these properties are not included hence,
the suit filed for partial partition is not maintainable. Therefore,
the appellants/defendants pray to allow the appeal
these properties are not included hence,
the suit filed for partial partition is not maintainable. Therefore,
the appellants/defendants pray to allow the appeal
suit for
partition, only the properties which were given to the
share of Ramachandra and Laxmanrao are included for
partition. Therefore, in this regard, there ... Jayarame Gowda and
Others1, has argued that suit for partial partition is not
maintainable. The facts and circumstances in the above
cited case
suit for
partition, only the properties which were given to the
share of Ramachandra and Laxmanrao are included for
partition. Therefore, in this regard, there ... Jayarame Gowda and
Others1, has argued that suit for partial partition is not
maintainable. The facts and circumstances in the above
cited case
Metal Closures Pvt Ltd vs Smt. Muniyamma on 9 April, 2026
Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
Bench
