Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2675 (3.31 seconds)

Mohanlal K. Shah (Huf) vs Ito on 22 September, 2004

year 1984. In or about 1985, an agreement for family partition among Bachubliai, Dr. Ramesh and R.M. Shah, HUF was entered into ... properties including immovable properties described in the agreement of family partition dated 7-8-1985, were divided amongst members/coparceners by metes and bounds
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 36 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

Income-Tax Officer vs Prem Das on 20 June, 1986

relevant for the assessment year 1968-69. On that date a partial partition was effected in terms of memorandum of partition of the same date ... partitioned. It was further stipulated that "whereas a partition has also taken place on 14-8-1967 among the four members of the said
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 12 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

B.R. Talwar vs Ito, Ward 2, Panchkula on 28 January, 2005

physical division of property shall not be deemed to be a partition within the meaning of section 171 . The assessing officer also referred ... Commissioner (Appeals) has passed a detailed order rejecting the claim of partition of the HUF on various grounds as under : (i) That reopening of assessment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 19 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next